PUMP vs. BW
PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) and BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. PUMP operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while BW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, PUMP returned 6.54%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for BW. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PUMP vs. BW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly lower than BW's 52.11% return.
PUMP
- 1D
- -8.56%
- 1M
- -27.09%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 79.83%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.46%
BW
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -34.95%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 52.11%
- 1Y
- 827.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- -24.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.42M | $38.78M | $59.56M | |
| $52.19M | $55.94M | $81.91M |
PUMP vs. BW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 13.46% | 1.93% | 11.34% | -19.19% | 28.02% | 9.61% | -34.31% | -8.69% | -38.89% | 34.40% |
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 52.11% | 286.59% | 12.33% | -74.70% | -36.03% | 156.98% | -3.57% | -6.76% | -93.13% | -38.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUMP and BW is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2017 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
PUMP:
$1.32B
BW:
$1.08B
PUMP:
-$0.22
BW:
-$0.79
PUMP:
1.29
BW:
1.68
PUMP:
$909.74M
BW:
$668.48M
PUMP:
$79.21M
BW:
$121.68M
PUMP:
$158.47M
BW:
-$41.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUMP vs. BW — Risk / Return Rank
PUMP
BW
PUMP vs. BW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PUMP | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 14.96 | -12.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 44.27 | -39.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PUMP vs. BW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, smaller than the maximum BW drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and BW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUMP | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -99.89% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.71% | -55.86% | +15.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.13% | -95.33% | +36.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.15% | -97.39% | +25.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.24% | -95.92% | +39.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -82.92% | +30.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.49% | 18.84% | -3.35% |
Volatility
PUMP vs. BW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is 20.75%, while Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a volatility of 23.67%. This indicates that PUMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUMP | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.75% | 23.67% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.35% | 86.65% | -43.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.58% | 129.02% | -48.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.08% | 110.72% | -48.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.92% | 108.43% | -37.51% |
Dividends
PUMP vs. BW - Dividend Comparison
PUMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 4.32% |
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 0.00% |
Financials
PUMP vs. BW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PUMP and BW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BW has higher volatility (23.67%) compared to PUMP (20.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs BW's -99.89%.
BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.49 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PUMP and BW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer