BW vs. CELC
BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) and CELC (Celcuity Inc.) are both stocks. BW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CELC operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, BW returned 5.96%/yr vs 34.40%/yr for CELC. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BW vs. CELC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 50.81% return, which is significantly higher than CELC's -13.39% return.
BW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -20.61%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 50.81%
- 1Y
- 925.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- -24.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.82%
CELC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -19.98%
- 6M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- 116.44%
- 3Y*
- 105.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.60M | $37.10M | $59.24M | |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | $119.16M | $168.28M | $170.21M |
BW vs. CELC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 50.81% | 286.59% | 12.33% | -74.70% | -36.03% | 156.98% | -3.57% | -6.76% | -93.13% | 63.22% |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | -13.39% | 661.96% | -10.16% | 4.00% | 6.22% | 44.00% | -13.91% | -55.65% | 26.60% | 53.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BW and CELC is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
BW:
$1.07B
CELC:
$4.21B
BW:
-$0.79
CELC:
-$3.81
BW:
$668.48M
CELC:
$0.00
BW:
$121.68M
CELC:
-$41.00K
BW:
-$41.40M
CELC:
-$168.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BW vs. CELC — Risk / Return Rank
BW
CELC
BW vs. CELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BW | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.26 | 2.80 | +11.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.23 | 7.33 | +36.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BW vs. CELC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than CELC's maximum drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and CELC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BW | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -85.64% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.72% | -43.25% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.33% | -61.99% | -33.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.39% | -76.32% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.96% | -40.42% | -55.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.94% | -44.81% | -38.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.18% | 16.51% | +3.67% |
Volatility
BW vs. CELC - Volatility Comparison
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a higher volatility of 31.34% compared to Celcuity Inc. (CELC) at 26.36%. This indicates that BW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BW | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.34% | 26.36% | +4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.95% | 54.17% | +34.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.11% | 76.79% | +53.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.10% | 101.04% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.62% | 91.43% | +17.19% |
Dividends
BW vs. CELC - Dividend Comparison
BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while CELC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 4.36% |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | 0.00% |
Financials
BW vs. CELC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Celcuity Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BW and CELC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BW has higher volatility (31.34%) compared to CELC (26.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs CELC's -85.64%.
BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.89 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BW and CELC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer