BW vs. CELC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC).

Performance

BW vs. CELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BW vs. CELC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.	131.70%	286.59%	12.33%	-74.70%	-36.03%	156.98%	-3.57%	-6.76%	-93.13%	59.10%
CELC Celcuity Inc.	14.44%	661.96%	-10.16%	4.00%	6.22%	44.00%	-13.91%	-55.65%	26.60%	32.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BW : $1.79B CELC : $6.00B
EPS BW : -$0.37 CELC : -$3.77
Total Revenue (TTM) BW : $587.70M CELC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) BW : $120.45M CELC : -$41.00K
EBITDA (TTM) BW : $43.52M CELC : -$151.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 131.70% return, which is significantly higher than CELC's 14.44% return.

BW

• 1D: 11.20%
• 1M: 65.80%
• YTD: 131.70%
• 6M: 406.55%
• 1Y: 2,084.71%
• 3Y*: 34.33%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: -23.57%

CELC

• 1D: 5.42%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 14.44%
• 6M: 131.05%
• 1Y: 1,028.98%
• 3Y*: 123.31%
• 5Y*: 50.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BW vs. CELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BW

BW Risk / Return Rank: 99
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CELC

CELC Risk / Return Rank: 100
CELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CELC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CELC Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BW vs. CELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BW	CELC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	12.57	5.78	+6.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.33	9.29	-3.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	2.19	-0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	32.40	36.65	-4.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	95.54	125.92	-30.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BW vs. CELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BW Sharpe Ratio is 12.57, which is higher than the CELC Sharpe Ratio of 5.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BW and CELC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BW	CELC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57	5.78	+6.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.49	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.30	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between BW and CELC is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BW vs. CELC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BW nor CELC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BW vs. CELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than CELC's maximum drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and CELC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BW	CELC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.89%	-85.64%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.00%	-27.68%	-18.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.39%	-82.70%	-14.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.79%	-2.65%	-91.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.64%	-45.80%	-36.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.64%	8.06%	+12.58%

Volatility

BW vs. CELC - Volatility Comparison

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a higher volatility of 60.61% compared to Celcuity Inc. (CELC) at 17.88%. This indicates that BW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BW	CELC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	60.61%	17.88%	+42.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.30%	49.80%	+43.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	168.16%	180.02%	-11.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	108.95%	104.16%	+4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.31%	91.62%	+15.69%

Financials