PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BW vs. SGML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BW vs. SGML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 178.86% return, which is significantly higher than SGML's 14.94% return.


BW

1D
-2.00%
1M
17.24%
YTD
178.86%
6M
174.96%
1Y
2,004.76%
3Y*
46.96%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
-22.27%

SGML

1D
-8.01%
1M
-32.83%
YTD
14.94%
6M
51.15%
1Y
202.59%
3Y*
-27.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BW vs. SGML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BW
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
178.86%286.59%12.33%-74.70%-36.03%36.25%
SGML
Sigma Lithium Resources Corp
14.94%17.56%-64.41%11.73%171.09%28.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BW and SGML is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BW:

$2.36B

SGML:

$1.69B

EPS

BW:

-$0.83

SGML:

-$0.39

PS Ratio

BW:

3.02

SGML:

16.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

BW:

$668.48M

SGML:

$104.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BW:

$121.68M

SGML:

$28.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

BW:

-$41.40M

SGML:

$5.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BW vs. SGML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BW
BW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SGML
SGML Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SGML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGML Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SGML Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGML Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BW vs. SGML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWSGMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.53

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

58.85

3.16

+55.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

135.77

9.77

+126.00

BW vs. SGML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BW Sharpe Ratio is 14.19, which is higher than the SGML Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BW and SGML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWSGMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19

0.72

+13.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.10

-0.29

Drawdowns

BW vs. SGML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than SGML's maximum drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and SGML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWSGMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-89.91%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.50%

-64.56%

+30.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.03%

-89.75%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.53%

-64.25%

-28.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-42.97%

-39.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

20.83%

-5.90%

Volatility

BW vs. SGML - Volatility Comparison

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a higher volatility of 34.66% compared to Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) at 24.63%. This indicates that BW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWSGMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.66%

24.63%

+10.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.70%

221.92%

-132.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.20%

283.19%

-139.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.03%

143.56%

-33.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.14%

143.56%

-35.42%

Dividends

BW vs. SGML - Dividend Comparison

Neither BW nor SGML has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BW vs. SGML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Sigma Lithium Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
214.41M
41.76M
(BW) Total Revenue
(SGML) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BW vs. SGML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Sigma Lithium Resources Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
55.5%
Portfolio components
BW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SGML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a gross profit of 23.15M and revenue of 41.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.

BW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.62M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.1%.

SGML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported an operating income of 19.48M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.7%.

BW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of -80.66M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in a net margin of -37.6%.

SGML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a net income of 10.98M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BW and SGML have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BW has higher volatility (34.66%) compared to SGML (24.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs SGML's -89.91%.

BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.19 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BW and SGML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer