PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 5.91%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.


PTMC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
12.33%
6M
11.93%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.91%

VO

1D
-2.06%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.01%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
12.33%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
8.64%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and VO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.74

The correlation between PTMC and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTMC vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTMC
VO

Industrials

23.6%
17.9%

Technology

16.4%
18.6%

Financial Services

15.1%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.6%

Real Estate

7.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.2%
8.5%

Utilities

3.0%
8.3%

Communication Services

1.4%
3.1%

Industrials

PTMC
23.6%
VO
17.9%

Technology

PTMC
16.4%
VO
18.6%

Financial Services

PTMC
15.1%
VO
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PTMC
10.8%
VO
8.6%

Healthcare

PTMC
8.8%
VO
7.6%

Real Estate

PTMC
7.0%
VO
5.4%

Basic Materials

PTMC
4.9%
VO
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

PTMC
4.8%
VO
4.8%

Energy

PTMC
4.2%
VO
8.5%

Utilities

PTMC
3.0%
VO
8.3%

Communication Services

PTMC
1.4%
VO
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMCVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.11

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

8.04

-0.92

PTMC vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMCVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.43

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

0.00

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-58.87%

+38.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.17%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-19.02%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-27.57%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

-39.37%

+18.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-2.06%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-7.86%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.14%

+0.28%

Volatility

PTMC vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.68%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.68%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

9.46%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

12.50%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

17.61%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

18.95%

-5.96%

PTMC vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTMC vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VO's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.64%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.38%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMC and VO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTMC has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to VO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.29% vs 5.91% for PTMC. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.38% for VO.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.03% for VO.

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer