PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. FLQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 1.19% return.


PTMC

1D
0.36%
1M
3.72%
YTD
15.78%
6M
13.34%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
6.66%

FLQM

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.19%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
15.78%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%10.82%
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.19%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-4.24%10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and FLQM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.65

The correlation between PTMC and FLQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTMCFLQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.04

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

2.86

+5.65

PTMC vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum FLQM drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and FLQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCFLQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-37.26%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-7.57%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-19.70%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-22.51%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-2.86%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-4.91%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.73%

-0.30%

Volatility

PTMC vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 3.08%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCFLQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

3.08%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

8.52%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

12.24%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

16.40%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

18.45%

-5.43%

PTMC vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTMC vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than FLQM's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%0.00%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.59%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMC and FLQM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTMC has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FLQM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

On 5-year performance, FLQM leads with 6.86% vs 4.32% for PTMC. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQM has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.51% for FLQM.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.30% for FLQM.

PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and FLQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer