PTH vs. ULVM
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTH returned -0.77%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
PTH vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.
PTH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PTH vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | -1.13% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 7.77% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and ULVM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PTH and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTH vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
ULVM
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PTH
ULVM
Financial Services
PTH
ULVM
Basic Materials
PTH
-
ULVM
Communication Services
PTH
-
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
ULVM
Energy
PTH
-
ULVM
Industrials
PTH
-
ULVM
Real Estate
PTH
-
ULVM
Technology
PTH
-
ULVM
Utilities
PTH
-
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
ULVM
PTH vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTH | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.50 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 18.64 | -11.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTH | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.71 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.74 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
PTH vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -40.71% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -6.47% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -18.14% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -19.77% | -30.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.32% | -0.13% | -19.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.00% | -5.75% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 1.56% | +3.10% |
Volatility
PTH vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 2.96% | +5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 7.97% | +9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 10.74% | +12.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 15.48% | +10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 18.86% | +8.38% |
PTH vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 3.11% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and ULVM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs -0.77% for PTH. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs -0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.
PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer