PTH vs. RSP
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTH is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTH returned 12.78%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
PTH vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 12.78%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.
PTH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
PTH vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | -1.13% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and RSP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTH and RSP has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PTH vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
RSP
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PTH
RSP
Financial Services
PTH
RSP
Basic Materials
PTH
-
RSP
Communication Services
PTH
-
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
RSP
Energy
PTH
-
RSP
Industrials
PTH
-
RSP
Real Estate
PTH
-
RSP
Technology
PTH
-
RSP
Utilities
PTH
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
RSP
PTH vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.49 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 9.48 | -2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.52 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.57 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
PTH vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -59.92% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -7.85% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -17.81% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -21.38% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | -39.04% | -14.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.32% | -0.38% | -18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.00% | -6.65% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 2.06% | +2.60% |
Volatility
PTH vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 2.56% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 8.29% | +9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 11.56% | +11.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 16.18% | +9.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 18.35% | +8.89% |
PTH vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 3.11% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and RSP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 12.78% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
PTH is categorized as Momentum, while RSP is S&P 500. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer