PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTH vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTH vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 12.78%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


PTH

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-4.72%
1Y
34.27%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
12.78%

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTH vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
-1.13%27.91%2.36%-4.54%-20.61%-3.20%67.26%34.45%-1.23%50.15%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and RSP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PTH and RSP has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PTH vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTH
RSP

Healthcare

100.0%
11.0%

Financial Services

0.1%
14.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Energy

-

4.5%

Industrials

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

-

19.6%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Healthcare

PTH
100.0%
RSP
11.0%

Financial Services

PTH
0.1%
RSP
14.5%

Basic Materials

PTH

-

RSP
4.1%

Communication Services

PTH

-

RSP
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PTH

-

RSP
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

PTH

-

RSP
6.5%

Energy

PTH

-

RSP
4.5%

Industrials

PTH

-

RSP
14.1%

Real Estate

PTH

-

RSP
6.0%

Technology

PTH

-

RSP
19.6%

Utilities

PTH

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTH vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTH
PTH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTH vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTHRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.49

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

9.48

-2.10

PTH vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTHRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.70

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.52

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.65

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Drawdowns

PTH vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTHRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.52%

-59.92%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-7.85%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

-17.81%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.07%

-21.38%

-28.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.52%

-39.04%

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.32%

-0.38%

-18.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.00%

-6.65%

-10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

2.06%

+2.60%

Volatility

PTH vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTHRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

2.56%

+6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.83%

8.29%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

11.56%

+11.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.49%

16.18%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

18.35%

+8.89%

PTH vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTH vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
3.11%3.07%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTH and RSP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTH has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 12.78% vs 11.86% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

PTH is categorized as Momentum, while RSP is S&P 500. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTH and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer