PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSX vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSX vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips 66 (PSX) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSX

1D
-0.58%
1M
7.49%
YTD
44.08%
6M
33.41%
1Y
65.68%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
19.31%
10Y*
12.61%

K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSX vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSX
Phillips 66
44.08%17.51%-11.63%33.07%49.58%8.51%-33.85%33.97%-12.28%20.94%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PSX and K is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2012

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSX:

$73.83B

K:

$29.20B

EPS

PSX:

$10.17

K:

$3.65

PE Ratio

PSX:

18.00

K:

22.87

PEG Ratio

PSX:

0.10

K:

3.84

PS Ratio

PSX:

0.55

K:

2.30

PB Ratio

PSX:

2.59

K:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSX:

$134.70B

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSX:

$5.94B

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSX:

$9.17B

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSX vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSX
PSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

K
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSX vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSXKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

PSX vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSXKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

PSX vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSXKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

Volatility

PSX vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSXKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.31%

Dividends

PSX vs. K - Dividend Comparison

PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than K's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
PSX
Phillips 66
2.70%3.68%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%

Financials

PSX vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips 66 and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
33.00B
3.26B
(PSX) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSX vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips 66 and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
33.3%
Portfolio components
PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 207.00M and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PSX and K have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSX and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer