PSX vs. XOM
PSX (Phillips 66) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PSX in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing, XOM in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, PSX returned 12.18%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for XOM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PSX vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSX achieves a 34.06% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PSX has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 12.18%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
PSX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 34.06%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- 1Y
- 45.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
PSX vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSX Phillips 66 | 34.06% | 17.51% | -11.63% | 33.07% | 49.58% | 8.51% | -33.85% | 33.97% | -12.28% | 20.94% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 17.68% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSX and XOM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSX and XOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PSX:
$68.69B
XOM:
$584.49B
PSX:
$10.17
XOM:
$5.93
PSX:
16.75
XOM:
23.57
PSX:
0.10
XOM:
1.09
PSX:
0.51
XOM:
1.83
PSX:
2.41
XOM:
2.30
PSX:
$134.70B
XOM:
$326.01B
PSX:
$5.94B
XOM:
$83.11B
PSX:
$9.17B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSX vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
PSX
XOM
PSX vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.53 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | 4.55 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSX vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSX and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -62.40% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -19.08% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.37% | -19.08% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.37% | -20.51% | -23.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.21% | -61.34% | -2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -17.96% | +9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -10.21% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 6.42% | -0.30% |
Volatility
PSX vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Phillips 66 (PSX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) have volatilities of 7.76% and 8.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.76% | 8.03% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.96% | 20.78% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.91% | 24.86% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.18% | 26.70% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 28.24% | +7.11% |
Dividends
PSX vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, which matches XOM's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSX Phillips 66 | 2.90% | 3.68% | 3.95% | 3.15% | 3.68% | 5.00% | 5.15% | 3.14% | 3.60% | 2.70% | 2.84% | 2.67% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.92% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
PSX vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips 66 and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSX vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
PSX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
PSX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
PSX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 207.00M and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSX and XOM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to PSX (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSX dropped -64.21% vs XOM's -62.40%.
PSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSX and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer