PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSX vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSX vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips 66 (PSX) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSX achieves a 43.67% return, which is significantly higher than CVX's 25.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PSX has outperformed CVX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


PSX

1D
1.29%
1M
4.37%
YTD
43.67%
6M
34.77%
1Y
65.22%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
19.84%
10Y*
12.75%

CVX

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
25.40%
6M
27.20%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSX vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSX
Phillips 66
43.67%17.51%-11.63%33.07%49.58%8.51%-33.85%33.97%-12.28%20.94%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
25.40%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSX and CVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2012

0.65

The correlation between PSX and CVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSX:

$73.62B

CVX:

$372.46B

EPS

PSX:

$10.17

CVX:

$5.75

PE Ratio

PSX:

17.95

CVX:

32.60

PEG Ratio

PSX:

0.10

CVX:

3.17

PS Ratio

PSX:

0.55

CVX:

1.93

PB Ratio

PSX:

2.58

CVX:

2.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSX:

$134.70B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSX:

$5.94B

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSX:

$9.17B

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSX vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSX
PSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSX vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSXCVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

1.90

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

2.49

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.07

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.14

7.97

+3.17

PSX vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSX and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSXCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.90

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.38

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Drawdowns

PSX vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSX and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSXCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-55.77%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-13.99%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.37%

-20.64%

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.37%

-24.95%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.21%

-55.77%

-8.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-10.36%

+8.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-11.39%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

5.39%

+0.57%

Volatility

PSX vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Phillips 66 (PSX) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 8.25%. This indicates that PSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSXCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

8.25%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.73%

17.81%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.65%

22.09%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.22%

25.12%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.32%

29.16%

+6.16%

Dividends

PSX vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than CVX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.72%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
PSX
Phillips 66
2.71%3.68%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%

Financials

PSX vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips 66 and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
33.00B
47.56B
(PSX) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSX vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips 66 and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%202220232024202520260
9.6%
Portfolio components
PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 207.00M and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PSX and CVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSX has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to CVX (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSX dropped -64.21% vs CVX's -55.77%.

PSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSX and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer