PortfoliosLab logo
PSX vs. MPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PSX and MPC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PSX vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips 66 (PSX) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PSX:

-0.34

MPC:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

PSX:

-0.22

MPC:

0.05

Omega Ratio

PSX:

0.97

MPC:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

PSX:

-0.25

MPC:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

PSX:

-0.76

MPC:

-0.34

Ulcer Index

PSX:

14.56%

MPC:

14.86%

Daily Std Dev

PSX:

34.98%

MPC:

36.08%

Max Drawdown

PSX:

-64.21%

MPC:

-79.67%

Current Drawdown

PSX:

-25.26%

MPC:

-22.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSX:

$50.81B

MPC:

$50.24B

EPS

PSX:

$4.45

MPC:

$7.26

PE Ratio

PSX:

28.02

MPC:

22.52

PEG Ratio

PSX:

0.88

MPC:

2.77

PS Ratio

PSX:

0.37

MPC:

0.36

PB Ratio

PSX:

1.88

MPC:

3.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSX:

$137.74B

MPC:

$138.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSX:

$8.40B

MPC:

$8.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSX:

$5.95B

MPC:

$9.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PSX has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 8.23%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.


PSX

YTD

10.50%

1M

29.69%

6M

-2.12%

1Y

-11.71%

5Y*

16.52%

10Y*

8.23%

MPC

YTD

19.17%

1M

35.23%

6M

5.73%

1Y

-2.69%

5Y*

45.16%

10Y*

15.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSX vs. MPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSX is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSX is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPC is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPC is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPC is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPC is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPC is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPC is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PSX vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSX and MPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PSX vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than MPC's 1.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PSX
Phillips 66
3.69%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%2.64%
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.60%2.43%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%

Drawdowns

PSX vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSX and MPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PSX vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

Phillips 66 (PSX) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 7.04%. This indicates that PSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PSX vs. MPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips 66 and Marathon Petroleum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
30.43B
31.85B
(PSX) Total Revenue
(MPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSX vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips 66 and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
6.5%
4.3%
(PSX) Gross Margin
(MPC) Gross Margin
PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 1.98B and revenue of 30.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.5%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 31.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of -395.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 687.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 487.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of -74.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.