PSX vs. COP
PSX (Phillips 66) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PSX in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing, COP in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, PSX returned 14.39%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for COP. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PSX vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSX achieves a 62.27% return, which is significantly higher than COP's 29.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSX having a 14.39% annualized return and COP not far ahead at 14.81%.
PSX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 47.21%
- YTD
- 62.27%
- 1Y
- 78.31%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 28.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.38%
COP
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 18.85%
- YTD
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 32.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $720.80M | $716.23M | $816.90M | |
PSX Phillips 66 | $490.19M | $501.82M | $467.42M |
PSX vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSX Phillips 66 | 62.27% | 17.51% | -11.63% | 33.07% | 49.58% | 8.51% | -33.85% | 33.97% | -12.28% | 20.94% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 29.24% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSX and COP is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSX and COP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PSX:
$82.67B
COP:
$145.17B
PSX:
$10.19
COP:
$5.93
PSX:
20.24
COP:
20.10
PSX:
0.12
COP:
1.16
PSX:
0.62
COP:
2.52
PSX:
2.91
COP:
2.26
PSX:
$134.70B
COP:
$58.31B
PSX:
$5.94B
COP:
$17.02B
PSX:
$9.17B
COP:
$22.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSX vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
PSX
COP
PSX vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips 66 (PSX) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSX | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 1.48 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 3.69 | +10.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSX vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSX and COP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSX | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -84.55% | +20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -22.28% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.37% | -36.19% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.37% | -36.19% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.21% | -70.66% | +6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -10.28% | +7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -25.46% | +10.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 8.89% | -3.24% |
Volatility
PSX vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
Phillips 66 (PSX) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSX | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 9.20% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.22% | 22.54% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.15% | 29.84% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 32.69% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.43% | 37.59% | -2.16% |
Dividends
PSX vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than COP's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.77% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
PSX Phillips 66 | 2.40% | 3.68% | 3.95% | 3.15% | 3.68% | 5.00% | 5.15% | 3.14% | 3.60% | 2.70% | 2.84% | 2.67% |
Financials
PSX vs. COP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSX vs. COP - Profitability Comparison
PSX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
PSX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
PSX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 207.00M and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSX and COP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to COP (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSX dropped -64.21% vs COP's -84.55%.
PSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSX and COP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer