K vs. GIS
K (Kellogg Company) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
K vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GIS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.05%
- YTD
- -19.35%
- 1Y
- -22.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.89%
- 10Y*
- -3.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.79M | $365.30M | $369.16M |
K vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -19.35% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between K and GIS is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between K and GIS has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
K:
$29.20B
GIS:
$19.08B
K:
$3.65
GIS:
-$0.16
K:
2.30
GIS:
1.05
K:
6.95
GIS:
2.60
K:
$12.67B
GIS:
$18.42B
K:
$4.41B
GIS:
$6.19B
K:
$2.25B
GIS:
$300.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
K
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GIS
K vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -59.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -54.37% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.42% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.14% | — |
Volatility
K vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.51% | — |
Dividends
K vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.83% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
Financials
K vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
K - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
K - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
K - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
K and GIS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer