K vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Kellogg Company (K) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: K or GIS.
Key characteristics
| K | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.89% | 10.70% |
| 1Y Return | -2.92% | -18.74% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.02% | 7.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.07% | 9.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.67% | 6.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.19 | -1.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.39% | 18.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.96% | -45.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.54% | -19.03% |
Fundamentals
| K | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.15B | $39.91B |
| EPS | $2.36 | $4.36 |
| PE Ratio | 26.21 | 16.22 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.93 | 1.98 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.98B | $20.17B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.63B | $6.55B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.85B | $4.30B |
Correlation
The correlation between K and GIS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
K vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, K achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, K has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 1.67%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
K vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
K vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than GIS's 3.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 3.58% | 3.99% | 3.29% | 3.59% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 2.95% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.33% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
K vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
K vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Kellogg Company (K) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 4.04%. This indicates that K's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
K vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities