PSQ vs. SH
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - PSQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%) while SH tracks the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -19.23%/yr vs -12.89%/yr for SH. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
PSQ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -19.23%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.89% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -26.29%
- 3Y*
- -18.98%
- 5Y*
- -14.55%
- 10Y*
- -19.23%
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
PSQ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -16.45% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and SH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PSQ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSQ vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSQ
SH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSQ
SH
Basic Materials
PSQ
-
SH
-
Communication Services
PSQ
-
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSQ
-
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
PSQ
-
SH
-
Energy
PSQ
-
SH
-
Healthcare
PSQ
-
SH
-
Industrials
PSQ
-
SH
-
Real Estate
PSQ
-
SH
-
Technology
PSQ
-
SH
-
Utilities
PSQ
-
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
SH
PSQ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.77 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.95 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.12 | -1.75 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.65 | -1.47 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | -0.54 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.87 | -0.72 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.59 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -94.66% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.93% | -18.28% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -38.82% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -44.53% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | -76.12% | -12.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.25% | -94.62% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.97% | -67.73% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 9.89% | +2.52% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 2.84% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 8.91% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 11.80% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 16.85% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 18.01% | +4.24% |
PSQ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than SH's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.24% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PSQ and SH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PSQ has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -19.23% for PSQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.51% for SH.
PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.90% for SH.
SH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.47 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer