PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSQ vs. SH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSQ vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -19.23%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.89% annualized return.


PSQ

1D
0.28%
1M
-9.35%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-14.96%
1Y
-26.29%
3Y*
-18.98%
5Y*
-14.55%
10Y*
-19.23%

SH

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-7.59%
1Y
-17.23%
3Y*
-13.02%
5Y*
-9.07%
10Y*
-12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-16.45%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
-8.00%-11.35%-13.52%-14.80%18.98%-24.21%-25.09%-22.12%4.93%-17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQ and SH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.89

The correlation between PSQ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSQ vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSQ
SH

Financial Services

74.7%
91.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PSQ
74.7%
SH
91.6%

Basic Materials

PSQ

-

SH

-

Communication Services

PSQ

-

SH

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSQ

-

SH

-

Consumer Defensive

PSQ

-

SH

-

Energy

PSQ

-

SH

-

Healthcare

PSQ

-

SH

-

Industrials

PSQ

-

SH

-

Real Estate

PSQ

-

SH

-

Technology

PSQ

-

SH

-

Utilities

PSQ

-

SH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSQ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSQSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.77

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.95

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.12

-1.75

-0.38

PSQ vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.65, which is comparable to the SH Sharpe Ratio of -1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQ and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSQSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.65

-1.47

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

-0.54

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.87

-0.72

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

-0.59

-0.18

Drawdowns

PSQ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and SH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSQSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.26%

-94.66%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.93%

-18.28%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-38.82%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.91%

-44.53%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.98%

-76.12%

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.25%

-94.62%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.97%

-67.73%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.41%

9.89%

+2.52%

Volatility

PSQ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSQSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

2.84%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

8.91%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

11.80%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.43%

16.85%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

18.01%

+4.24%

PSQ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSQ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than SH's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
5.24%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
4.51%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PSQ and SH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSQ has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs SH's -94.66%.

On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -19.23% for PSQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.

PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.51% for SH.

PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.90% for SH.

SH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.47 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSQ and SH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer