PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSQ vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSQ vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of -19.02%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.


PSQ

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-13.33%
6M
-11.75%
1Y
-23.25%
3Y*
-18.03%
5Y*
-13.88%
10Y*
-19.02%

CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQ vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-13.33%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQ and CRM is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

-0.64

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PSQ and CRM has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.64 to -0.23, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSQ vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQ vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSQCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.84

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.84

-1.62

-0.22

PSQ vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQ and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSQCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.39

-0.88

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

-0.13

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.86

0.24

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

0.45

-1.21

Drawdowns

PSQ vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSQCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.26%

-70.50%

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.86%

-39.36%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-54.70%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.91%

-58.62%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.98%

-58.62%

-30.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.19%

-49.87%

-48.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-16.12%

-57.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

20.48%

-7.85%

Volatility

PSQ vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 6.66%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSQCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

16.96%

-10.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

31.74%

-18.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

37.87%

-21.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

37.02%

-14.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

35.36%

-13.05%

Dividends

PSQ vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than CRM's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
5.05%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSQ and CRM have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to PSQ (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs CRM's -70.50%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSQ and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer