CRM vs. ANET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET).

Performance

CRM vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRM vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRM salesforce.com, inc.	-29.70%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	-4.72%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	42.86%	-3.46%	-10.56%	143.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRM : $175.07B ANET : $159.28B
EPS CRM : $7.78 ANET : $2.76
PE Ratio CRM : 23.94 ANET : 45.32
PEG Ratio CRM : 0.05 ANET : 1.06
PS Ratio CRM : 4.30 ANET : 17.67
PB Ratio CRM : 2.96 ANET : 12.88
Total Revenue (TTM) CRM : $41.53B ANET : $9.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRM : $32.26B ANET : $5.77B
EBITDA (TTM) CRM : $10.85B ANET : $4.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -29.70% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's -4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 9.55%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 41.49% annualized return.

CRM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: -29.70%
• 6M: -20.85%
• 1Y: -30.62%
• 3Y*: -1.92%
• 5Y*: -2.93%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

ANET

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -16.36%
• 1Y: 59.06%
• 3Y*: 43.82%
• 5Y*: 45.34%
• 10Y*: 41.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRM vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 9
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 74
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRM vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRM	ANET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	1.10	-1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.13	1.70	-2.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.22	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	2.16	-2.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	4.77	-6.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRM vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and ANET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRM	ANET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.87	1.10	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.99	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.94	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.79	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and ANET is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRM vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
CRM salesforce.com, inc.	0.89%	0.63%	0.48%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRM vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and ANET.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRM	ANET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.50%	-52.20%	-18.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.51%	-28.33%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.62%	-50.42%	-8.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.62%	-52.20%	-6.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.98%	-22.95%	-26.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	-15.48%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.29%	12.82%	+5.47%

Volatility

CRM vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) is 11.35%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 18.49%. This indicates that CRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRM	ANET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.35%	18.49%	-7.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.89%	36.69%	-9.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.34%	53.90%	-18.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.01%	45.96%	-9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.72%	44.40%	-9.68%

Financials

CRM vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between salesforce.com, inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 8.69B and revenue of 11.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.6%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported an operating income of 1.87B and revenue of 11.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.03B and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a net income of 1.94B and revenue of 11.20B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 955.80M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.