PSQ vs. AMLP

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -19.15%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for AMLP. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.

Performance

PSQ vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -14.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of -19.15%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.92% annualized return.

PSQ

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -14.02%
• 6M: -14.04%
• 1Y: -24.40%
• 3Y*: -17.58%
• 5Y*: -13.78%
• 10Y*: -19.15%

AMLP

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 15.02%
• 3Y*: 20.22%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 6.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQ vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ	-14.02%	-15.51%	-15.68%	-32.01%	36.40%	-24.84%	-41.23%	-27.49%	-2.34%	-24.77%
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	15.29%	5.78%	22.76%	21.40%	25.47%	39.09%	-32.26%	5.99%	-12.67%	-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQ and AMLP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010	-0.33

The correlation between PSQ and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSQ vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSQ	AMLP
Financial Services	84.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	97.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

PSQ vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQ

PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 38
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQ vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSQ	AMLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.36	1.25	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.04	1.79	-3.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.22	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	1.66	-2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.81	5.35	-7.16

PSQ vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQ and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSQ vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and AMLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSQ	AMLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.26%	-77.19%	-21.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.86%	-8.94%	-17.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.65%	-14.27%	-35.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.91%	-20.92%	-39.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.98%	-72.62%	-16.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.20%	-4.94%	-93.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	-17.37%	-56.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.96%	2.77%	+10.19%

Volatility

PSQ vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSQ	AMLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	4.71%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	8.77%	+4.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	11.84%	+5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	19.95%	+2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	27.67%	-5.33%

PSQ vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSQ vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than AMLP's 7.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.71%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ	5.09%	4.97%	7.15%	6.01%	0.35%	0.00%	0.31%	1.75%	0.95%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSQ and AMLP in my portfolio?

PSQ and AMLP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSQ or AMLP?

PSQ has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

Which ETF is better, PSQ or AMLP?

On 10-year performance, AMLP leads with 6.92% vs -19.15% for PSQ. On fees, AMLP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSQ or AMLP?

Over the 10-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 6.92% return vs -19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSQ or AMLP?

AMLP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSQ or AMLP?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 5.09% for PSQ.

What is the main difference between PSQ and AMLP?

PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.90% for AMLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.