PortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and ET is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

AMLP vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
104.01%
463.19%
AMLP
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMLP:

0.73

ET:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

AMLP:

1.06

ET:

1.08

Omega Ratio

AMLP:

1.14

ET:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

AMLP:

0.93

ET:

0.74

Martin Ratio

AMLP:

3.69

ET:

2.82

Ulcer Index

AMLP:

3.59%

ET:

6.46%

Daily Std Dev

AMLP:

18.26%

ET:

26.00%

Max Drawdown

AMLP:

-77.19%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

AMLP:

-5.90%

ET:

-15.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 3.02%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.


AMLP

YTD

4.67%

1M

-4.94%

6M

9.78%

1Y

12.68%

5Y*

26.84%

10Y*

3.02%

ET

YTD

-9.48%

1M

-7.57%

6M

9.83%

1Y

17.78%

5Y*

30.61%

10Y*

1.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMLP vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMLP is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMLP is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMLP is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMLP is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMLP is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMLP is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMLP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMLP, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
AMLP: 0.73
ET: 0.70
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMLP, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
AMLP: 1.06
ET: 1.08
The chart of Omega ratio for AMLP, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
AMLP: 1.14
ET: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMLP, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
AMLP: 0.93
ET: 0.74
The chart of Martin ratio for AMLP, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
AMLP: 3.69
ET: 2.82

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.73
0.70
AMLP
ET

Dividends

AMLP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than ET's 7.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.68%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.30%7.97%8.09%9.84%6.45%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.37%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.90%
-15.88%
AMLP
ET

Volatility

AMLP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 11.68%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.68%
16.28%
AMLP
ET