PSN vs. ANF
PSN (Parsons Corporation) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. PSN operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PSN returned 7.45%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for ANF. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSN vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSN achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -28.04% return.
PSN
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- -8.25%
- 6M
- -10.47%
- 1Y
- -19.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ANF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 25.97%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.26%
PSN vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSN Parsons Corporation | -8.25% | -33.01% | 47.11% | 35.59% | 37.44% | -7.58% | -11.80% | 34.68% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -28.04% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -38.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSN and ANF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
PSN:
$2.78
ANF:
$10.45
PSN:
20.37
ANF:
8.67
PSN:
0.50
ANF:
0.00
PSN:
0.74
ANF:
0.81
PSN:
$6.30B
ANF:
$5.28B
PSN:
$1.08B
ANF:
$2.56B
PSN:
$507.45M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSN vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
PSN
ANF
PSN vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSN | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.11 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.33 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 0.62 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSN vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSN drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSN and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSN | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.99% | -86.59% | +29.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.41% | -45.65% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.99% | -65.89% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.99% | -69.93% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.96% | -52.91% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -42.90% | +26.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.34% | 24.42% | -0.08% |
Volatility
PSN vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parsons Corporation (PSN) is 9.96%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 15.82%. This indicates that PSN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSN | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.96% | 15.82% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.10% | 38.52% | -7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.12% | 61.90% | -18.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 61.04% | -27.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 61.00% | -26.04% |
Dividends
PSN vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSN nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
PSN Parsons Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSN vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parsons Corporation and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSN vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
PSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported an operating income of 95.67M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
PSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a net income of 52.93M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSN and ANF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to PSN (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSN dropped -56.99% vs ANF's -86.59%.
ANF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSN and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer