PSN vs. GFF
PSN (Parsons Corporation) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PSN in Specialty Industrial Machinery, GFF in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 5 years, PSN returned 2.74%/yr vs 35.25%/yr for GFF. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PSN vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSN achieves a -28.46% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 17.59% return.
PSN
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -21.46%
- 6M
- -36.90%
- YTD
- -28.46%
- 1Y
- -40.03%
- 3Y*
- -3.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.20%
GFF
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 35.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.01M | $26.26M | $31.76M | |
| $119.03M | $84.89M | $72.69M |
PSN vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSN Parsons Corporation | -28.46% | -33.01% | 47.11% | 35.59% | 37.44% | -7.58% | -11.80% | 34.68% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 17.59% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 22.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSN and GFF is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.33 |
The correlation between PSN and GFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSN:
$4.73B
GFF:
$3.95B
PSN:
$1.45
GFF:
$0.76
PSN:
30.53
GFF:
113.38
PSN:
0.76
GFF:
1.47
PSN:
0.76
GFF:
1.68
PSN:
1.83
GFF:
41.69
PSN:
$6.29B
GFF:
$2.35B
PSN:
$1.35B
GFF:
$1.00B
PSN:
$394.64M
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSN vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
PSN
GFF
PSN vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSN | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.07 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.26 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 0.67 | -2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSN vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSN drawdown since its inception was -64.42%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSN and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSN | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.42% | -96.84% | +32.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.84% | -27.85% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.42% | -27.85% | -36.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.42% | -39.02% | -25.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -11.65% | -49.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.39% | -55.34% | +37.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.35% | 10.70% | +17.65% |
Volatility
PSN vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
Parsons Corporation (PSN) has a higher volatility of 46.01% compared to Griffon Corporation (GFF) at 9.79%. This indicates that PSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSN | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.01% | 9.79% | +36.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.06% | 27.77% | +27.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.06% | 37.36% | +20.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.74% | 41.26% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.67% | 45.51% | -7.84% |
Dividends
PSN vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
PSN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.97% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
PSN Parsons Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSN vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parsons Corporation and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSN vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
PSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.49M and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.9%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
PSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parsons Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
PSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a net income of -15.22M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSN and GFF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSN has higher volatility (46.01%) compared to GFF (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSN dropped -64.42% vs GFF's -96.84%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSN and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer