PSN vs. COST

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).

Performance

PSN vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PSN vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSN Parsons Corporation	-10.86%	-33.01%	47.11%	35.59%	37.44%	-7.58%	-11.80%	37.28%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	15.72%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	22.65%

Fundamentals

EPS PSN : $4.12 COST : $25.63
PE Ratio PSN : 13.38 COST : 38.88
PEG Ratio PSN : 0.44 COST : 3.04
PS Ratio PSN : 0.63 COST : 1.16
Total Revenue (TTM) PSN : $6.36B COST : $286.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) PSN : $1.06B COST : $19.33B
EBITDA (TTM) PSN : $517.19M COST : $12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSN achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.72% return.

PSN

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -18.82%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 6M: -35.37%
• 1Y: -7.51%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: —

COST

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 27.83%
• 5Y*: 24.29%
• 10Y*: 22.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PSN vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSN

PSN Risk / Return Rank: 33
PSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PSN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PSN Martin Ratio Rank: 34

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 46
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 40
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSN vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSN	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.25	-0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	0.50	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.06	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	0.31	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	0.61	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSN vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSN Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSN and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSN	COST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	0.25	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	1.08	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.59	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between PSN and COST is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PSN vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

PSN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSN Parsons Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.52%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%

Drawdowns

PSN vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSN drawdown since its inception was -55.84%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSN and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSN	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.84%	-53.39%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.96%	-19.35%	-24.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.84%	-31.40%	-24.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.38%	-6.95%	-44.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-13.40%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.11%	9.67%	+7.44%

Volatility

PSN vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Parsons Corporation (PSN) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.38%. This indicates that PSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSN	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.26%	4.38%	+9.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.74%	13.33%	+24.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.06%	20.08%	+22.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.81%	22.51%	+10.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.85%	21.90%	+12.95%

Financials

PSN vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Parsons Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

PSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parsons Corporation reported an operating income of 105.23M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

PSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a net income of 114.68M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.