PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIX vs. EMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSIX vs. EMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) and Emera Inc (EMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIX achieves a -30.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMA's 5.65% return.


PSIX

1D
5.96%
1M
-47.50%
YTD
-30.26%
6M
-33.00%
1Y
-16.09%
3Y*
158.76%
5Y*
56.83%
10Y*
9.24%

EMA

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
5.65%
6M
10.36%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIX vs. EMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
-30.26%39.43%
EMA
Emera Inc
5.65%11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIX and EMA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

-0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSIX:

$919.06M

EMA:

$15.54B

EPS

PSIX:

$4.43

EMA:

$3.55

PE Ratio

PSIX:

8.99

EMA:

14.37

PEG Ratio

PSIX:

0.09

EMA:

0.46

PS Ratio

PSIX:

1.57

EMA:

1.79

PB Ratio

PSIX:

4.95

EMA:

1.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSIX:

$586.96M

EMA:

$8.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSIX:

$172.81M

EMA:

$2.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSIX:

$102.78M

EMA:

$2.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIX vs. EMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIX
PSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA
EMA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIX vs. EMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) and Emera Inc (EMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSIXEMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.27

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

3.52

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

9.44

-9.89

PSIX vs. EMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the EMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIX and EMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSIXEMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.54

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.38

-1.32

Drawdowns

PSIX vs. EMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIX drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than EMA's maximum drawdown of -5.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIX and EMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIXEMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.55%

-5.93%

-92.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.60%

-5.93%

-62.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.58%

-4.74%

-60.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.23%

-1.76%

-66.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.00%

2.20%

+33.80%

Volatility

PSIX vs. EMA - Volatility Comparison

Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a higher volatility of 60.17% compared to Emera Inc (EMA) at 4.67%. This indicates that PSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIXEMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

60.17%

4.67%

+55.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.62%

10.21%

+79.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.20%

13.60%

+89.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.43%

13.72%

+99.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.98%

13.72%

+92.26%

Dividends

PSIX vs. EMA - Dividend Comparison

PSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.


PositionTTM2025
EMA
Emera Inc
3.87%2.12%
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Financials

PSIX vs. EMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Solutions International, Inc. and Emera Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202220232024202520260
2.48B
(PSIX) Total Revenue
(EMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PSIX and EMA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIX has higher volatility (60.17%) compared to EMA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIX dropped -98.55% vs EMA's -5.93%.

EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIX and EMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer