PortfoliosLab logo
PSIX vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PSIX and CLS is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PSIX vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PSIX:

6.68

CLS:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

PSIX:

4.19

CLS:

1.80

Omega Ratio

PSIX:

1.52

CLS:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

PSIX:

8.98

CLS:

1.75

Martin Ratio

PSIX:

40.50

CLS:

4.29

Ulcer Index

PSIX:

21.04%

CLS:

21.95%

Daily Std Dev

PSIX:

131.55%

CLS:

75.47%

Max Drawdown

PSIX:

-98.55%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

PSIX:

-50.99%

CLS:

-19.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSIX:

$974.86M

CLS:

$13.27B

EPS

PSIX:

$3.53

CLS:

$3.58

PE Ratio

PSIX:

12.00

CLS:

32.23

PEG Ratio

PSIX:

-0.30

CLS:

19.42

PS Ratio

PSIX:

1.89

CLS:

1.32

PB Ratio

PSIX:

11.23

CLS:

8.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSIX:

$614.44M

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSIX:

$154.71M

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSIX:

$95.98M

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIX achieves a 42.42% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 25.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PSIX has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of -2.25%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.69% annualized return.


PSIX

YTD

42.42%

1M

64.74%

6M

37.79%

1Y

862.95%

3Y*

168.05%

5Y*

54.58%

10Y*

-2.25%

CLS

YTD

25.01%

1M

29.34%

6M

35.36%

1Y

106.33%

3Y*

118.70%

5Y*

76.27%

10Y*

24.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celestica Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSIX vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSIX is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSIX is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSIX is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSIX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSIX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSIX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PSIX vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PSIX Sharpe Ratio is 6.68, which is higher than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIX and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PSIX vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSIX nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PSIX vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIX drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIX and CLS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PSIX vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 14.80%. This indicates that PSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PSIX vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Solutions International, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
144.30M
2.65B
(PSIX) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSIX vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Power Solutions International, Inc. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
27.9%
10.3%
(PSIX) Gross Margin
(CLS) Gross Margin
PSIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Power Solutions International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.29M and revenue of 144.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.9%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

PSIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Power Solutions International, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.63M and revenue of 144.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

PSIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Power Solutions International, Inc. reported a net income of 19.08M and revenue of 144.30M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.