PSFF vs. VTI
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. PSFF is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFF returned 9.43%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
PSFF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
PSFF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 5.72% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | -4.11% | 11.81% | 0.37% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and VTI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PSFF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSFF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFF
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSFF
VTI
Financial Services
PSFF
VTI
Communication Services
PSFF
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
PSFF
VTI
Healthcare
PSFF
VTI
Industrials
PSFF
VTI
Consumer Defensive
PSFF
VTI
Energy
PSFF
VTI
Utilities
PSFF
VTI
Real Estate
PSFF
VTI
Basic Materials
PSFF
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
VTI
PSFF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.42 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.17 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.44 | 14.62 | +5.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.33 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.73 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.51 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -55.45% | +44.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -8.92% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -19.30% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | -25.36% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.72% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -8.03% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.93% | -1.20% |
Volatility
PSFF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.02%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 2.96% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.54% | 9.13% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 12.17% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 17.40% | -8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 18.30% | -9.20% |
PSFF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and VTI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PSFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 9.43% for PSFF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
PSFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.03% for VTI.
PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer