PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFF vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


PSFF

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.85%
YTD
5.72%
6M
6.41%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
5.72%10.38%13.18%18.39%-4.11%11.81%0.37%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFF and VTI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020

0.87

The correlation between PSFF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFF
VTI

Technology

36.2%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.2%

Industrials

8.1%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

PSFF
36.2%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

PSFF
11.9%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

PSFF
10.9%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFF
10.1%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

PSFF
8.4%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

PSFF
8.1%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSFF
4.9%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

PSFF
3.5%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

PSFF
2.3%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

PSFF
1.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

PSFF
1.8%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFF
PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFFVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.42

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.17

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.44

14.62

+5.81

PSFF vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFFVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.33

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.73

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.51

+0.60

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFFVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-55.45%

+44.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.67%

-8.92%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.78%

-19.30%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.78%

-25.36%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.72%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-8.03%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.93%

-1.20%

Volatility

PSFF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.02%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFFVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

2.96%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

9.13%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

12.17%

-6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.22%

17.40%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

18.30%

-9.20%

PSFF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFF and VTI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PSFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 9.43% for PSFF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.

PSFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.03% for VTI.

PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFF and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer