PSFF vs. NVDO
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PSFF vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSFF vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 5.32% | 3.85% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 16.35% | 10.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and NVDO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
NVDO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSFF vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSFF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -16.25% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -4.73% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -4.97% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
PSFF vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92% | 32.05% | -26.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 32.05% | -22.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 32.05% | -22.97% |
PSFF vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.32% | 16.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and NVDO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSFF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSFF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer