PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDO vs. XMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDO vs. XMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDO achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than XMAY's 2.71% return.


NVDO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.57%
YTD
16.35%
6M
18.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMAY

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.71%
6M
2.73%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDO vs. XMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDO and XMAY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDO vs. XMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XMAY
XMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDO vs. XMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDOXMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.29

NVDO vs. XMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDO vs. XMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDO drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, which is greater than XMAY's maximum drawdown of -8.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDO and XMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDOXMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-8.24%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-0.87%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-0.42%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

NVDO vs. XMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDOXMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.12%

3.82%

+28.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.12%

7.47%

+24.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.12%

7.47%

+24.65%

NVDO vs. XMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDO vs. XMAY - Dividend Comparison

NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%, while XMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDO and XMAY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAY.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for XMAY.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for NVDO and 0.85% for XMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDO and XMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer