PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDO vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDO vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDO achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 8.48% return.


NVDO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.57%
YTD
16.35%
6M
21.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
0.70%
1M
1.98%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDO vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDO and RB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDO vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVDO vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDO vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDO drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDO and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDORBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-2.09%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

0.00%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-0.44%

-4.53%

Volatility

NVDO vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDORBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.20%

6.56%

+25.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.20%

6.56%

+25.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

6.56%

+25.64%

NVDO vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDO vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%, more than RB's 1.96% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDO and RB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 1.96% for RB.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for NVDO and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDO and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer