PSCX vs. ICOW
PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. PSCX is actively managed, while ICOW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCX returned 8.22%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for ICOW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
PSCX vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 8.64% return.
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 14.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 4.46% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.43% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.64% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCX and ICOW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PSCX and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCX vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCX
ICOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PSCX
ICOW
Financial Services
PSCX
ICOW
-
Communication Services
PSCX
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
PSCX
ICOW
Healthcare
PSCX
ICOW
Industrials
PSCX
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
PSCX
ICOW
Energy
PSCX
ICOW
Utilities
PSCX
ICOW
-
Real Estate
PSCX
ICOW
-
Basic Materials
PSCX
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCX vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
PSCX
ICOW
PSCX vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.51 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.03 | 11.46 | +5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCX vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -43.49% | +33.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -8.02% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | -14.81% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.20% | -27.79% | +17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -8.01% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -7.56% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 2.45% | -1.62% |
Volatility
PSCX vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.79%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 5.85% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 11.90% | -7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65% | 14.75% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 16.77% | -9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 18.51% | -11.54% |
PSCX vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCX vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.35% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCX and ICOW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to PSCX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 8.76% vs 8.22% for PSCX. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
PSCX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.65% for ICOW.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCX and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer