PSCC vs. LGLV
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while LGLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.95%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for LGLV. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGLV.
Performance
PSCC vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed LGLV with an annualized return of 6.95%, while LGLV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
LGLV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
PSCC vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.78% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 30.83% | 0.32% | 17.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and LGLV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PSCC and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCC vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
LGLV
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
LGLV
Basic Materials
PSCC
LGLV
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
LGLV
Industrials
PSCC
LGLV
Financial Services
PSCC
LGLV
Communication Services
PSCC
-
LGLV
Energy
PSCC
-
LGLV
Healthcare
PSCC
-
LGLV
Real Estate
PSCC
-
LGLV
Technology
PSCC
-
LGLV
Utilities
PSCC
-
LGLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
LGLV
PSCC vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.10 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.76 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 1.80 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and LGLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -36.64% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -6.86% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -10.17% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -17.49% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -36.64% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.31% | -4.79% | -6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -3.22% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 2.90% | +5.79% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) at 3.51%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 3.51% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 7.00% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 9.57% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 12.94% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 16.07% | +3.26% |
PSCC vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than LGLV's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and LGLV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to LGLV (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs LGLV's -36.64%.
On 10-year performance, LGLV leads with 11.29% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LGLV has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.72% for PSCC.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while LGLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.12% for LGLV.
LGLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and LGLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer