PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCC vs. FSTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCC vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 19.62% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 6.81%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.


PSCC

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.70%
6M
10.74%
YTD
19.62%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
1.30%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
6.81%
ALL TIME*
10.95%

FSTA

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.66%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
7.71%
ALL TIME*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.81M$6.37M$6.76M
$228.35K$315.30K$252.74K

PSCC vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
19.62%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
10.31%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and FSTA is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.60

The correlation between PSCC and FSTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCC vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCC
FSTA

Consumer Defensive

90.8%
96.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
1.2%

Industrials

2.3%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCC
90.8%
FSTA
96.6%

Basic Materials

PSCC
4.3%
FSTA
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCC
2.6%
FSTA
1.2%

Industrials

PSCC
2.3%
FSTA
0.3%

Financial Services

PSCC
0.2%
FSTA

-

Communication Services

PSCC

-

FSTA

-

Energy

PSCC

-

FSTA

-

Healthcare

PSCC

-

FSTA
0.0%

Real Estate

PSCC

-

FSTA

-

Technology

PSCC

-

FSTA
0.4%

Utilities

PSCC

-

FSTA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCC vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCC vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCCFSTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.95

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

1.77

-0.69

PSCC vs. FSTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the FSTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and FSTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and FSTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCCFSTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-25.13%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-9.29%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-11.08%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-16.58%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-25.13%

-8.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-4.64%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-3.58%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

4.99%

+2.67%

Volatility

PSCC vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 5.51%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCCFSTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

5.93%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

11.45%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

13.81%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

13.41%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

14.68%

+4.69%

PSCC vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCC vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FSTA's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.17%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
1.64%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCC and FSTA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to PSCC (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs FSTA's -25.13%.

On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.71% vs 6.81% for PSCC. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.71% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.64% for PSCC.

PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.08% for FSTA.

FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCC and FSTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer