PRM vs. CSV
PRM (Perimeter Solutions, SA) and CSV (Carriage Services, Inc.) are both stocks. PRM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while CSV operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, PRM returned 70.22%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for CSV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRM vs. CSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than CSV's -10.79% return.
PRM
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 140.65%
- 3Y*
- 70.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -20.91%
- YTD
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -9.83%
- 1Y
- -15.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
PRM vs. CSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 8.39% | 115.41% | 177.83% | -49.67% | -34.20% | 15.75% |
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | -10.79% | 7.27% | 61.83% | -7.71% | -56.70% | 30.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRM and CSV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PRM and CSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRM:
$4.93B
CSV:
$592.50M
PRM:
-$1.25
CSV:
$2.81
PRM:
6.42
CSV:
1.41
PRM:
4.53
CSV:
2.22
PRM:
$705.90M
CSV:
$416.49M
PRM:
$397.78M
CSV:
$147.10M
PRM:
-$257.38M
CSV:
$108.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRM vs. CSV — Risk / Return Rank
PRM
CSV
PRM vs. CSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRM | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.92 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | -0.55 | +5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | -1.60 | +17.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRM | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | -0.61 | +3.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.08 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
PRM vs. CSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, smaller than the maximum CSV drawdown of -95.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and CSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRM | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.51% | -95.90% | +16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.20% | -27.58% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.29% | -40.56% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -68.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.24% | -39.49% | +27.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -51.42% | +21.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.12% | 9.44% | -0.32% |
Volatility
PRM vs. CSV - Volatility Comparison
Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) at 9.11%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRM | CSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 9.11% | +9.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.30% | 18.47% | +14.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.55% | 25.07% | +23.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 36.71% | +13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 36.87% | +12.97% |
Dividends
PRM vs. CSV - Dividend Comparison
PRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.94% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRM vs. CSV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perimeter Solutions, SA and Carriage Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRM vs. CSV - Profitability Comparison
PRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a gross profit of 50.79M and revenue of 125.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.6%.
CSV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.64M and revenue of 106.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
PRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported an operating income of -21.70M and revenue of 125.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.4%.
CSV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.28M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
PRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a net income of 72.94M and revenue of 125.07M, resulting in a net margin of 58.3%.
CSV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a net income of 13.49M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRM and CSV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRM has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to CSV (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs CSV's -95.90%.
PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRM and CSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer