PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRM vs. LAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRM vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -34.17% return.


PRM

1D
-17.78%
1M
-9.76%
6M
17.06%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
95.72%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.20%

LAC

1D
-0.69%
1M
-23.67%
6M
-41.07%
YTD
-34.17%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-32.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.24M$30.56M$47.54M
$62.72M$52.99M$57.03M

PRM vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, SA
11.19%115.41%177.83%1.32%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
-34.17%46.80%-53.59%-27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PRM and LAC is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRM:

$4.99B

LAC:

$640.81M

EPS

PRM:

-$2.19

LAC:

-$0.26

PB Ratio

PRM:

5.38

LAC:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRM:

$757.07M

LAC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRM:

$414.16M

LAC:

-$580.22K

EBITDA (TTM)

PRM:

-$329.06M

LAC:

-$52.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRM vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRM
PRM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LAC
LAC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRM vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMLACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

0.16

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

0.25

+9.09

PRM vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRM and LAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRM vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and LAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMLACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.51%

-81.83%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.20%

-73.03%

+42.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.98%

-75.51%

+56.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-63.46%

+34.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.65%

47.39%

-37.74%

Volatility

PRM vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 23.38% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.02%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMLACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.38%

16.02%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.49%

49.65%

-7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.26%

131.45%

-77.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

99.78%

-49.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

99.78%

-49.00%

Dividends

PRM vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRM nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PRM vs. LAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perimeter Solutions, SA and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRM and LAC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRM has higher volatility (23.38%) compared to LAC (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs LAC's -81.83%.

PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRM and LAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer