PRM vs. LAC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).

Performance

PRM vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRM vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA	-5.99%	115.41%	177.83%	6.98%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PRM : $3.85B LAC : $962.45M
EPS PRM : -$1.40 LAC : $0.00
PB Ratio PRM : 3.79 LAC : 0.91
Total Revenue (TTM) PRM : $652.86M LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) PRM : $375.15M LAC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) PRM : -$146.24M LAC : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a -5.99% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -9.40% return.

PRM

• 1D: 5.98%
• 1M: 11.26%
• YTD: -5.99%
• 6M: 18.07%
• 1Y: 153.73%
• 3Y*: 47.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -22.85%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -43.89%
• 1Y: 43.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRM vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRM

PRM Risk / Return Rank: 96
PRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PRM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PRM Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 62
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRM vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRM	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	0.33	+2.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	1.86	+2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.22	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	0.73	+4.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.07	1.30	+16.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRM vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRM Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRM and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRM	LAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	0.33	+2.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	-0.31	+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between PRM and LAC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRM vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRM nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PRM vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRM	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.51%	-81.83%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.20%	-63.08%	+32.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.69%	-66.30%	+53.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.62%	-63.64%	+33.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.69%	35.08%	-26.39%

Volatility

PRM vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.21%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRM	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.01%	16.21%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.90%	69.33%	-32.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.88%	130.24%	-81.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.80%	102.58%	-52.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.80%	102.58%	-52.78%

Financials