PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRM vs. VST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRM vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -7.89% return.


PRM

1D
-17.78%
1M
-9.76%
6M
17.06%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
95.72%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.20%

VST

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.89%
6M
-6.16%
YTD
-7.89%
1Y
-28.40%
3Y*
76.26%
5Y*
53.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$62.72M$52.99M$57.03M
$607.28M$633.08M$737.36M

PRM vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, SA
11.19%115.41%177.83%-49.67%-34.20%26.27%
VST
Vistra Corp.
-7.89%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%16.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PRM and VST is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRM:

$4.99B

VST:

$49.97B

EPS

PRM:

-$2.19

VST:

$9.68

PS Ratio

PRM:

6.26

VST:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRM:

$757.07M

VST:

$17.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRM:

$414.16M

VST:

$1.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRM:

-$329.06M

VST:

$4.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRM vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRM
PRM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRM vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMVSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.93

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

-0.75

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

-1.25

+10.58

PRM vs. VST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the VST Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRM and VST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRM vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and VST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMVSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.51%

-53.32%

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.20%

-38.01%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.25%

-48.80%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.98%

-31.71%

+12.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-13.90%

-15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.65%

22.95%

-13.30%

Volatility

PRM vs. VST - Volatility Comparison

Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 23.38% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 12.98%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMVSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.38%

12.98%

+10.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.49%

34.02%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.26%

48.95%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

48.14%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

42.23%

+8.55%

Dividends

PRM vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

PRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, SA
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.61%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%

Financials

PRM vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perimeter Solutions, SA and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PRM vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Perimeter Solutions, SA and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a gross profit of 140.47M and revenue of 213.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.7%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported an operating income of -203.02M and revenue of 213.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -95.0%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

PRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a net income of -181.64M and revenue of 213.81M, resulting in a net margin of -85.0%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRM and VST have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRM has higher volatility (23.38%) compared to VST (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs VST's -53.32%.

PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRM and VST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer