PRM vs. CP
PRM (Perimeter Solutions, SA) and CP (Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited) are both stocks. PRM operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while CP operates in Railroads (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, PRM returned 86.50%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for CP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRM vs. CP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a 35.96% return, which is significantly higher than CP's 16.60% return.
PRM
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 20.35%
- YTD
- 35.96%
- 6M
- 33.77%
- 1Y
- 181.85%
- 3Y*
- 86.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
PRM vs. CP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 35.96% | 115.41% | 177.83% | -49.67% | -34.20% | 26.27% |
CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited | 16.60% | 2.60% | -7.84% | 6.85% | 4.71% | -6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRM and CP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.33 |
The correlation between PRM and CP shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRM:
$6.18B
CP:
$76.87B
PRM:
-$1.25
CP:
$4.47
PRM:
8.06
CP:
5.22
PRM:
5.68
CP:
1.62
PRM:
$705.90M
CP:
$14.98B
PRM:
$397.78M
CP:
$8.47B
PRM:
-$257.38M
CP:
$8.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRM vs. CP — Risk / Return Rank
PRM
CP
PRM vs. CP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRM | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.08 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 0.48 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 0.92 | +18.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRM vs. CP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, which is greater than CP's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and CP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRM | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.51% | -69.17% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.20% | -16.23% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.52% | -25.88% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -6.13% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -20.28% | -9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.18% | 8.51% | +0.67% |
Volatility
PRM vs. CP - Volatility Comparison
Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 13.79% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) at 6.73%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRM | CP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.79% | 6.73% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.61% | 17.69% | +16.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.32% | 22.75% | +26.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 24.49% | +25.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 25.60% | +24.38% |
Dividends
PRM vs. CP - Dividend Comparison
PRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited | 0.77% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.84% | 0.76% | 0.93% | 1.07% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRM vs. CP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perimeter Solutions, SA and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRM vs. CP - Profitability Comparison
PRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a gross profit of 50.79M and revenue of 125.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.6%.
CP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.0%.
PRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported an operating income of -21.70M and revenue of 125.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.4%.
CP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported an operating income of 1.26B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.
PRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perimeter Solutions, SA reported a net income of 72.94M and revenue of 125.07M, resulting in a net margin of 58.3%.
CP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a net income of 846.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRM and CP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRM has higher volatility (13.79%) compared to CP (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs CP's -69.17%.
PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRM and CP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer