PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSV achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CSV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.05%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


CSV

1D
2.95%
1M
-9.92%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-6.86%
1Y
-9.87%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
7.05%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSV
Carriage Services, Inc.
-6.42%7.27%61.83%-7.71%-56.70%107.92%24.25%67.51%-38.90%-9.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CSV and VOO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.38

The correlation between CSV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSV
CSV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSVVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

2.67

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

11.96

-12.87

CSV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSV Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSV drawdown since its inception was -95.90%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.90%

-33.99%

-61.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.58%

-8.90%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.56%

-18.69%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.52%

-24.52%

-44.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-33.99%

-34.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.52%

-3.14%

-33.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-3.68%

-47.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.88%

1.99%

+8.89%

Volatility

CSV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that CSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

4.83%

+5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.52%

9.82%

+9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.82%

12.46%

+13.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.82%

16.91%

+19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.95%

18.02%

+18.93%

Dividends

CSV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSV
Carriage Services, Inc.
1.14%1.06%1.13%1.80%1.63%0.64%1.08%1.17%1.94%0.88%0.52%0.41%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSV and VOO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSV has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSV dropped -95.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer