PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRM vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRM vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRM having a 11.19% return and ACWI slightly higher at 11.28%.


PRM

1D
-17.78%
1M
-9.76%
6M
17.06%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
95.72%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.20%

ACWI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.18%
6M
8.21%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.53%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$420.02M$465.87M$510.46M
$62.72M$52.99M$57.03M

PRM vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, SA
11.19%115.41%177.83%-49.67%-34.20%26.27%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
11.28%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PRM and ACWI is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.44

The correlation between PRM and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRM vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRM
PRM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRM vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.29

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

9.58

-0.24

PRM vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRM and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRM vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.51%

-56.00%

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.20%

-9.73%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.25%

-16.55%

-34.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.98%

-1.58%

-17.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-8.55%

-20.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.65%

2.33%

+7.32%

Volatility

PRM vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 23.38% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 4.03%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.38%

4.03%

+19.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.49%

11.71%

+30.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.26%

14.01%

+40.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

16.23%

+34.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

17.06%

+33.72%

Dividends

PRM vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

PRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.44%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, SA
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRM and ACWI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRM has higher volatility (23.38%) compared to ACWI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRM and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer