PRM vs. ACWI
PRM (Perimeter Solutions, SA) is a stock, while ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Over the past 3 years, PRM returned 86.50%/yr vs 20.81%/yr for ACWI. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRM vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRM achieves a 35.96% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.10% return.
PRM
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 20.35%
- YTD
- 35.96%
- 6M
- 33.77%
- 1Y
- 181.85%
- 3Y*
- 86.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
PRM vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 35.96% | 115.41% | 177.83% | -49.67% | -34.20% | 26.27% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.10% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | -0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRM and ACWI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.44 |
The correlation between PRM and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRM vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
PRM
ACWI
PRM vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRM | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 3.03 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 13.22 | +6.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRM vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRM drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRM and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRM | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.51% | -56.00% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.20% | -9.73% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.52% | -16.55% | -35.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.85% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -8.59% | -20.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.18% | 2.22% | +6.96% |
Volatility
PRM vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Perimeter Solutions, SA (PRM) has a higher volatility of 13.79% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 5.16%. This indicates that PRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRM | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.79% | 5.16% | +8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.61% | 11.20% | +23.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.32% | 13.50% | +35.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 16.17% | +33.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 17.15% | +32.83% |
Dividends
PRM vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
PRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
PRM Perimeter Solutions, SA | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRM and ACWI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRM has higher volatility (13.79%) compared to ACWI (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRM dropped -79.51% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
PRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRM and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer