CSV vs. XLK
CSV (Carriage Services, Inc.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, CSV returned 6.97%/yr vs 23.77%/yr for XLK. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CSV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSV achieves a -4.09% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CSV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 6.97%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.
CSV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 1Y
- -9.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.13%
XLK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 23.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.53M | $4.41M | $5.23M | |
| $1.61B | $1.67B | $2.22B |
CSV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | -4.09% | 7.27% | 61.83% | -7.71% | -56.70% | 107.92% | 24.25% | 67.51% | -38.90% | -9.44% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.09% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSV and XLK is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CSV and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CSV
XLK
CSV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.16 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 5.85 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSV drawdown since its inception was -95.90%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.90% | -82.05% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -15.92% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.62% | -25.66% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.52% | -33.56% | -34.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.52% | -33.56% | -34.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -11.43% | -23.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.34% | -34.80% | -16.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.61% | 5.86% | +7.75% |
Volatility
CSV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 9.38% and 9.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 9.58% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.32% | 21.81% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.41% | 25.59% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.01% | 25.75% | +11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.02% | 24.90% | +12.12% |
Dividends
CSV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.94% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSV and XLK have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to CSV (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSV dropped -95.90% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer