PRFZ vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
PRFZ and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRFZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2006. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both PRFZ and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PRFZ vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRFZ vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.18% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.82% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.68%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
XLG
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRFZ vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
XLG
PRFZ vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRFZ | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.52 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.60 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 5.67 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRFZ | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.74 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and XLG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -52.39% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.87% | -12.41% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -28.02% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -30.46% | -13.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -9.56% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -7.69% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.49% | +0.18% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.76%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 5.76% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 10.64% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 19.97% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 18.69% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 18.81% | +3.63% |