PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. SFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly lower than SFLO's 27.87% return.


PRFZ

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.45%
6M
13.03%
YTD
17.59%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
10.03%

SFLO

1D
0.33%
1M
6.46%
6M
25.77%
YTD
27.87%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.67M$5.60M$8.64M
$4.38M$3.53M$2.43M

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
17.59%11.26%12.68%2.07%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
27.87%11.88%6.54%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and SFLO is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023

0.83

The correlation between PRFZ and SFLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
SFLO

Technology

19.5%
32.1%

Healthcare

17.8%
16.3%

Industrials

16.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

13.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
12.6%

Real Estate

6.9%
0.1%

Energy

4.4%
15.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
8.2%

Utilities

1.3%
0.1%

Technology

PRFZ
19.5%
SFLO
32.1%

Healthcare

PRFZ
17.8%
SFLO
16.3%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.1%
SFLO
8.3%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.6%
SFLO
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
11.2%
SFLO
12.6%

Real Estate

PRFZ
6.9%
SFLO
0.1%

Energy

PRFZ
4.4%
SFLO
15.4%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.2%
SFLO
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
3.0%
SFLO
6.1%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
SFLO
8.2%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.3%
SFLO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLO
SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZSFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.22

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

17.48

-7.40

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and SFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than SFLO's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and SFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZSFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-26.63%

-35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-7.80%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.26%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-4.15%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.33%

+0.73%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 3.77%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZSFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

5.58%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

13.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

17.73%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

20.50%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

20.50%

+1.88%

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SFLO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.80%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
0.72%1.04%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFZ and SFLO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLO has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to PRFZ (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs SFLO's -26.63%.

On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 44.31% vs 33.30% for PRFZ. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 44.31% return vs 33.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.72% for SFLO.

PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.49% for SFLO.

SFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and SFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer