PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than PXF's 16.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRFZ having a 11.56% annualized return and PXF not far behind at 11.54%.


PRFZ

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.30%
6M
10.57%
YTD
17.94%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
10.07%

PXF

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.97%
6M
11.51%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
35.55%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
17.94%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
16.06%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and PXF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007

0.73

The correlation between PRFZ and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
PXF

Technology

19.5%
13.8%

Healthcare

17.8%
7.5%

Industrials

16.1%
14.6%

Financial Services

13.6%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.9%

Real Estate

6.9%
1.7%

Energy

4.4%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.0%

Utilities

1.3%
3.4%

Technology

PRFZ
19.5%
PXF
13.8%

Healthcare

PRFZ
17.8%
PXF
7.5%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.1%
PXF
14.6%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.6%
PXF
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
11.2%
PXF
9.9%

Real Estate

PRFZ
6.9%
PXF
1.7%

Energy

PRFZ
4.4%
PXF
8.7%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.2%
PXF
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
3.0%
PXF
6.5%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
PXF
4.0%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.3%
PXF
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.27

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

11.67

-1.81

PRFZ vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, roughly equal to the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-64.74%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-10.91%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-14.06%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-26.82%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-41.59%

-2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-4.30%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-15.19%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.05%

-0.01%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 3.97%, while Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.68%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

14.52%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

16.54%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

16.59%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

17.75%

+4.63%

PRFZ vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than PXF's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.80%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.17%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFZ and PXF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to PRFZ (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.56% vs 11.54% for PXF. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for PXF.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.80% for PRFZ.

PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PXF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex-US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.43% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer