PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAE vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PRAE vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRAE vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRAE
PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF
1.57%13.70%8.54%0.57%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
-1.32%18.41%13.79%0.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAE achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's -1.32% return.


PRAE

1D
-0.43%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
1.57%
6M
4.70%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOA

1D
-0.07%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
0.53%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRAE vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAE has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PRAE vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAE
PRAE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAE vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRAEEAOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.77

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.76

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

7.86

+0.34

PRAE vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAE and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRAEEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.79

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between PRAE and EAOA is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PRAE vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

PRAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than EAOA's 2.17% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
PRAE
PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF
0.52%0.18%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.17%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%

Drawdowns

PRAE vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAE drawdown since its inception was -17.67%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAE and EAOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAEEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.67%

-25.06%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-8.17%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-5.21%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-5.44%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.23%

+0.53%

Volatility

PRAE vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRAEEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.16%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

8.42%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

14.10%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

13.18%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

13.16%

+1.86%