PRAE vs. BAMY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PRAE (PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PRAE returned 26.90% vs 8.77% for BAMY. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRAE charges 1.43%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.

Performance

PRAE vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAE achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.51% return.

PRAE

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 3.55%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 1Y: 26.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.09%

BAMY

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 0.68%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 1Y: 8.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	$140.48K	$148.08K	$178.43K
PRAE PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF	$53.94K	$44.85K	$42.03K

PRAE vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRAE PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF	9.22%	13.70%	8.54%	0.07%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.51%	12.93%	10.60%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAE and BAMY is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023	0.65

The correlation between PRAE and BAMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRAE vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRAE

PRAE Risk / Return Rank: 65
PRAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PRAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PRAE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PRAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PRAE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 86
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRAE vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRAE	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.98	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.93	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	3.55	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.66	15.58	-6.92

PRAE vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAE and BAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRAE vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAE drawdown since its inception was -17.67%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAE and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRAE	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.67%	-6.03%	-11.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-2.48%	-7.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-0.26%	-2.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-0.52%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	0.56%	+2.55%

Volatility

PRAE vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 0.72%. This indicates that PRAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRAE	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	0.72%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	2.82%	+9.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.96%	4.45%	+11.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	5.89%	+9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	5.89%	+9.05%

PRAE vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAE has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRAE vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

PRAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BAMY's 7.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.56%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%
PRAE PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF	0.49%	0.18%	0.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRAE and BAMY in my portfolio?

PRAE and BAMY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRAE or BAMY?

PRAE has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BAMY (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAE dropped -17.67% vs BAMY's -6.03%.

Which ETF is better, PRAE or BAMY?

On 1-year performance, PRAE leads with 26.90% vs 8.77% for BAMY. On fees, PRAE is cheaper at 1.43% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRAE or BAMY?

Over the 1-year period, PRAE has performed better with a 26.90% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRAE or BAMY?

PRAE is cheaper with a 1.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRAE or BAMY?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.49% for PRAE.

What is the main difference between PRAE and BAMY?

They also come from different issuers: PlanRock and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.43% for PRAE and 1.48% for BAMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.