PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAE vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAE vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAE achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than EAOR's 7.61% return.


PRAE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.81%
6M
3.55%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.09%

EAOR

1D
0.71%
1M
0.34%
6M
5.43%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$69.40K$77.56K$61.86K
$53.94K$44.85K$42.03K

PRAE vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRAE
PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF
9.22%13.70%8.54%0.07%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.61%15.59%10.69%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAE and EAOR is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023

0.78

The correlation between PRAE and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAE vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRAE
PRAE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PRAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRAE vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAEEAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.43

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

10.07

-1.41

PRAE vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAE and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAE vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAE drawdown since its inception was -17.67%, smaller than the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAE and EAOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAEEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.67%

-22.91%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-6.62%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.55%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.95%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.59%

+1.52%

Volatility

PRAE vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF (PRAE) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAEEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.77%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

7.79%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

9.32%

+6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

10.65%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

10.41%

+4.53%

PRAE vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAE has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAE vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

PRAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than EAOR's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.37%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%
PRAE
PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF
0.49%0.18%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAE and EAOR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRAE has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to EAOR (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAE dropped -17.67% vs EAOR's -22.91%.

On 1-year performance, PRAE leads with 26.90% vs 16.02% for EAOR. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRAE has performed better with a 26.90% return vs 16.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.43% for PRAE.

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.49% for PRAE.

They also come from different issuers: PlanRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.43% for PRAE and 0.18% for EAOR.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAE and EAOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer