PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
POWR vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

POWR vs. IGF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds from iShares - POWR tracks the S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWR returned 8.36%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for IGF. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

POWR vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 10.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POWR having a 8.36% annualized return and IGF not far behind at 8.14%.

POWR

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.78%
6M
6.76%
YTD
12.12%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
8.36%
ALL TIME*
4.05%

IGF

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.09%
6M
5.19%
YTD
10.41%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
$38.15M$37.64M$47.97M

POWR

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
$5.98M$6.98M$7.47M

POWR vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		12.12%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%8.44%-11.74%9.69%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		10.41%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and IGF is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.55

The correlation between POWR and IGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

POWR vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
POWR
IGF

Utilities

58.2%
40.0%

Industrials

23.7%
36.4%

Energy

12.4%
20.5%

Technology

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

POWR
58.2%
IGF
40.0%

Industrials

POWR
23.7%
IGF
36.4%

Energy

POWR
12.4%
IGF
20.5%

Technology

POWR
5.4%
IGF

-

Basic Materials

POWR
0.1%
IGF

-

Communication Services

POWR

-

IGF

-

Consumer Cyclical

POWR

-

IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

POWR

-

IGF

-

Financial Services

POWR

-

IGF

-

Healthcare

POWR

-

IGF

-

Real Estate

POWR

-

IGF
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. AIPOPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUI
Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU

Return for Risk

POWR vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POWR vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

POWRIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.87
1.55

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.28
2.25

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.83

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

7.59

-2.20

POWR vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWR and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWR vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and IGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

POWRIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-58.33%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-5.87%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-11.31%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-20.83%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

-42.11%

-21.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-2.34%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-11.79%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.19%

+0.60%

Volatility

POWR vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 2.75%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

POWRIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

2.75%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

8.92%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

10.69%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

13.95%

+8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

16.71%

+8.79%

POWR vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWR vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than IGF's 2.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		2.89%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.75%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

POWR and IGF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to IGF (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs IGF's -58.33%.

On 10-year performance, POWR leads with 8.36% vs 8.14% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, POWR has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.89% for IGF.

POWR tracks S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.39% for IGF.

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer