POWR vs. XLUI
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and XLUI (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. POWR is passively managed, while XLUI is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLUI.
Performance
POWR vs. XLUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than XLUI's 9.74% return.
POWR
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
XLUI
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. XLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 14.85% | 0.26% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 9.74% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and XLUI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.46 |
POWR vs. XLUI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWR
XLUI
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
POWR
XLUI
-
Industrials
POWR
XLUI
-
Energy
POWR
XLUI
-
Technology
POWR
XLUI
-
Basic Materials
POWR
XLUI
-
Communication Services
POWR
-
XLUI
-
Consumer Cyclical
POWR
-
XLUI
-
Consumer Defensive
POWR
-
XLUI
-
Financial Services
POWR
-
XLUI
Healthcare
POWR
-
XLUI
-
Real Estate
POWR
-
XLUI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. XLUI — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
XLUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR vs. XLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. XLUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than XLUI's maximum drawdown of -6.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and XLUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -6.01% | -59.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -0.93% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -1.89% | -16.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
POWR vs. XLUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 11.17% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 11.17% | +11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 11.17% | +14.32% |
POWR vs. XLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. XLUI - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than XLUI's 13.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.61% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.80% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and XLUI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.
XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.80%, compared with 5.61% for POWR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.35% for XLUI.
Find the right allocation for POWR and XLUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer