PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
POWR vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

POWR vs. AIPO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. POWR is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.

Performance

POWR vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 49.68% return.

POWR

1D
1.52%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
19.64%
6M
18.33%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
9.07%

AIPO

1D
0.61%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
49.68%
6M
45.88%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWR vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		19.64%1.59%
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		49.68%9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and AIPO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.61

POWR vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
POWR
AIPO

Utilities

45.6%
21.2%

Industrials

33.0%
46.4%

Energy

11.0%
6.1%

Technology

9.5%
18.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

POWR
45.6%
AIPO
21.2%

Industrials

POWR
33.0%
AIPO
46.4%

Energy

POWR
11.0%
AIPO
6.1%

Technology

POWR
9.5%
AIPO
18.9%

Basic Materials

POWR
1.0%
AIPO

-

Communication Services

POWR

-

AIPO
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

POWR

-

AIPO

-

Consumer Defensive

POWR

-

AIPO

-

Financial Services

POWR

-

AIPO
5.3%

Healthcare

POWR

-

AIPO

-

Real Estate

POWR

-

AIPO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUIPOWR vs. SOXX
Often compared with AIPO:
AIPO vs. DTCRAIPO vs. TCAIAIPO vs. VOLTAIPO vs. AISAIPO vs. IVESAIPO vs. IVEPAIPO vs. ARTY

Return for Risk

POWR vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWR vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

POWRAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.16

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

—

—

POWR vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWR vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and AIPO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

POWRAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-17.31%

-48.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-4.77%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-4.45%

-13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

—

—

Volatility

POWR vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

POWRAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

35.45%

-18.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

35.45%

-12.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

35.45%

-9.93%

POWR vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWR vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.39%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

POWR and AIPO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

POWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer