PORTX vs. SGMAX
PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) and SGMAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PORTX returned 2.38%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SGMAX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PORTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SGMAX.
Performance
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than SGMAX's 7.47% return.
PORTX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- -0.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
SGMAX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 15.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 5.75% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 28.20% | -7.24% | 27.89% |
SGMAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund | 7.47% | 17.93% | 15.18% | 8.86% | -3.41% | 18.94% | -2.71% | 20.58% | -4.41% | 17.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PORTX and SGMAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PORTX and SGMAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PORTX vs. SGMAX — Risk / Return Rank
PORTX
SGMAX
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PORTX | SGMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.56 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 9.94 | -10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than SGMAX's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and SGMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PORTX | SGMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.71% | -31.27% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -5.88% | -14.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -11.57% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -22.11% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -2.00% | -7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -4.79% | -6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 1.51% | +6.92% |
Volatility
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Volatility Comparison
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) at 1.88%. This indicates that PORTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PORTX | SGMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 1.88% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.81% | 5.68% | +13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 7.66% | +13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 13.76% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 14.18% | +3.95% |
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SGMAX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PORTX vs. SGMAX - Dividend Comparison
PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
SGMAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund | 13.54% | 14.55% | 12.63% | 6.40% | 11.12% | 15.38% | 2.06% | 4.81% | 7.86% | 4.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PORTX and SGMAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PORTX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SGMAX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs SGMAX's -31.27%.
SGMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PORTX and SGMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer