PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PORTX vs. RTXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 14.49% return.


PORTX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.61%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.29%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
9.68%

RTXAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
14.49%
6M
14.66%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
7.50%1.15%7.67%19.02%-24.04%22.16%24.56%12.09%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
14.49%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PORTX and RTXAX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PORTX and RTXAX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PORTX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PORTX
PORTX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PORTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PORTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PORTX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PORTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PORTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PORTXRTXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.39

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

4.75

-4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

17.79

-17.49

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PORTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PORTX and RTXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and RTXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PORTXRTXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.71%

-40.68%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-5.21%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-17.13%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

-24.63%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-2.99%

-4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-7.74%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.40%

1.39%

+7.01%

Volatility

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 3.42%. This indicates that PORTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PORTXRTXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

3.42%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

8.33%

+10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

11.05%

+9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

15.84%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

20.03%

-1.81%

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

PORTX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%12.61%5.84%3.55%2.61%1.85%2.32%4.50%2.46%4.66%5.86%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.50%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PORTX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PORTX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to RTXAX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.

RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PORTX and RTXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer