PORTX vs. RTXAX
PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) and RTXAX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PORTX returned 2.57%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for RTXAX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PORTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RTXAX.
Performance
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 15.39% return.
PORTX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- -0.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 8.42% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 12.09% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 15.39% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PORTX and RTXAX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PORTX and RTXAX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PORTX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank
PORTX
RTXAX
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PORTX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 4.56 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 15.80 | -15.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and RTXAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PORTX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.71% | -40.68% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -5.21% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -17.13% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -24.63% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -2.23% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -7.70% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.56% | 1.50% | +7.06% |
Volatility
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 3.17%. This indicates that PORTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PORTX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 3.17% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | 8.39% | +10.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.65% | 11.01% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 15.80% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 19.96% | -1.87% |
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
PORTX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison
PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.48% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PORTX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PORTX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to RTXAX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.
RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PORTX and RTXAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer