PORTX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
PORTX is managed by Trillium Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | -7.91% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 28.20% | -7.24% | 27.89% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PORTX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
PORTX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 6M
- -18.21%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PORTX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PORTX
FGIAX
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PORTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | 1.75 | -2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 2.26 | -2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 2.61 | -3.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 12.12 | -13.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PORTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.75 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.80 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PORTX and FGIAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PORTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.71% | -49.35% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -8.29% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -21.08% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -38.02% | +6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -3.78% | -17.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -7.22% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.48% | 1.78% | +5.70% |
Volatility
PORTX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) is 3.48%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that PORTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PORTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 4.05% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 7.09% | +10.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.39% | 12.28% | +11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 13.08% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 15.17% | +2.96% |