PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PORTX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PORTX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


PORTX

1D
2.05%
1M
0.17%
6M
6.45%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
9.38%
ALL TIME*
6.24%

UCEQX

1D
1.69%
1M
0.77%
6M
10.61%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
8.99%1.15%7.67%19.02%-24.04%22.16%24.56%28.20%-7.24%27.89%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
14.16%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PORTX and UCEQX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2012

0.92

The correlation between PORTX and UCEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PORTX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PORTX
PORTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PORTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PORTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PORTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PORTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PORTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PORTXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.34

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

2.81

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

12.09

-12.07

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PORTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PORTX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PORTXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.71%

-35.33%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-8.96%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-15.64%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

-25.24%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-35.33%

+3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-0.42%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.70%

-4.83%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.74%

2.08%

+6.66%

Volatility

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PORTXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.40%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

11.02%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.72%

13.32%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

15.39%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

16.46%

+1.65%

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PORTX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PORTX
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%12.61%5.84%3.55%2.61%1.85%2.32%4.50%2.46%4.66%5.86%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.45%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


PORTX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PORTX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to UCEQX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PORTX dropped -51.71% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PORTX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer